国产成人久久777777-国产农村妇女毛片精品久久-精品少妇人妻AV一区二区-少妇人妻精品一区二区三区-无码人妻精品一区二区

法律類文章:A QUESTION OF PRIVACY

時間:2023-05-04 17:45:46 考研英語 我要投稿
  • 相關推薦

法律類文章精選:A QUESTION OF PRIVACY

7 A QUESTION OF PRIVACY

法律類文章精選:A QUESTION OF PRIVACY

  Behind the brewing war over protecting patients' records in an age of HMOs and online medicine.

  Technology is a two-edged sword. Rarely is this as clear as it is in the realm of health care. Technology allows doctors to test their patients for genetic defects--and then to turn around and spread the results throughout the world via the Internet. For someone in need of treatment, that's good news. But for someone in search of a job or an insurance policy, the tidings can be all bad.

  Last week President Bill Clinton proposed a corollary to the patients' bill of rights now before Congress: a right to medical privacy. Beginning in 2002, under rules set to become law in February, patients would be able to stipulate the conditions under which their personal medical data could be divulged. They would be able to examine their records and make corrections. They could learn who else had seen the information. Improper use of records by a caregiver or insurer could result in both civil and criminal penalties. The plan was, said Clinton, "an unprecedented step toward putting Americans back in control of their own medical records."

  While the administration billed the rules as an attempt to strike a balance between the needs of consumers and those of the health-care industry, neither doctors nor insurance companies were happy. The doctors said the rules could actually erode privacy, pointing to a provision allowing managed-care plans to use personal information without consent if the purpose was "health-care operations." That, physicians said, was a loophole through which HMOs and other insurers could pry into the doctor-patient relationship, in the name of assessing the quality of care. Meanwhile, the insurers protested that the rules would make them vulnerable to lawsuits. They were especially disturbed by a provision holding them liable for privacy breaches by "busines

【法律類文章:A QUESTION OF PRIVACY】相關文章:

Privacy of Famous People06-05

To be,or not to be,that is the question:的翻譯05-02

如何撰寫教育教學類文章04-28

怎樣撰寫“解題指導”類的文章04-30

法律類社會實踐報告12-10

學會用法律保護自己文章12-30

淺談生活情感類文章的技巧指導05-01

自然科學類文章閱讀淺談04-30

介紹我的法律類自學考試經驗04-29

作文 議論類的文章應當以論點為宜04-24

主站蜘蛛池模板: 静安区| 甘谷县| 清原| 福鼎市| 孟村| 奇台县| 深泽县| 古蔺县| 漳州市| 祁阳县| 遂川县| 麟游县| 栾城县| 塘沽区| 桦甸市| 盈江县| 星子县| 凤城市| 建水县| 繁昌县| 左贡县| 敦化市| 岫岩| 齐河县| 黔西县| 吉林省| 舞钢市| 凤冈县| 沁源县| 哈尔滨市| 宁津县| 黄龙县| 武安市| 桐乡市| 满洲里市| 赣榆县| 辽源市| 台南市| 汉中市| 郴州市| 永嘉县|